Sorry if this doesn't go with a bang

1.  What is wrong with the theory of evolution from a scientific basis of view? 

Well let's see the validity of this.

Nothing + nothing = two elements + time = 92 natural elements + time = all physical laws and a completely structured universe of galaxies, systems, stars, planets and moons orbiting in perfect balance and order.

Yep, perfectly scientific, can't see any problem with that, clearly. 

 Does 'theistic evolution' mitigate any of these difficulties?

No it is a fudge at best. It rejects sound reading of scripture, and follows bad science. There are no winners with it. 

2.  What are some of the 'evil fruits' that the theory of evolution has produced? 

To be brief, it denies the scientific basis of a young earth,also it eliminates the veracity of Genesis 1-11, which in turn destroys Romans 5.12-14. Let alone the six days of the  creation, the basis of the sabbath. The rank decline of morality if you take natural selection to its logical extent. (If it benefits me, then boo to you, I can take it, wreck it, defile it etc)

3.  What potential does the theory of evolution have to affect: 

a. one's view of self?

If I am an animal then why not treat everyone as one. I am not in the image of God. I can kill the unborn without remorse. And if life 'goes wrong' why continue living, if I am a chance event by random processes.

b. a person's world view?

Loyalty is not important, either to my spouse, as I am to keep my genes going, or society, as might is right and I must force my agenda, and if you resist me that's your problem not mine.

4.  Where is the theory of evolution (including 'theistic evolution') in clear contradiction to Scripture?

That we are not 'wonderfully and fearfully made', nor 'knit together in my mother's womb'. As before with Genesis 1.1-11, and Romans 5. As far as theistic evolution, what a impotent God we have, as He is contingent on a process like evolution.

5.  We hear it said that 'theistic evolution' is 'bad theology'.  What does this mean, and is it true? What might motivate a 'Christian' to make this compromise?